The world presently captivated by the remarkable daylight theft striking the world's most famous art museum on Sunday daybreak. As visitors lined up to access the gallery, thieves made their getaway from a different section, after a operation on the crown jewels that lasted just a few moments. The incident might have been lifted straight from a blockbuster film or an episode of the French suspense series the program Lupin.
However, even though this shocking robbery has shocked France, it was perhaps a appropriate act of larceny for a state that has recently been the prey of a separate astonishing heist. Beginning on a Monday to the next the citizens were swindled into assuming we were receiving a different leadership. The political drama made a lot of individuals as if we were bewildered characters in a repetitive cycle, but possibly the closer analogy is to be located in the bizarre theft at the Louvre.
Briefly stated: the government leader, stepped down on the sixth of October, less than a month into his tenure. He surrendered when it was obvious he could not win the backing of the parliament for his budget. His departure led to the collapse of the briefest government in the annals of the French Republic. However, 48 hours after stating that his “mission” as government head was completed, he came back in an daring step by the president, who gave the previous leader with the exact objective he had just failed at.
Over the next week, the country was rocked by exceptional political upheaval, however the public ended up returned in the same situation we had started, even though made to think that we had a different leadership.
This deception dates back to the president's reckless decision to declare a early election in that year, after the nationalist right made historic gains in continental polls. The support or remove dare produced a clear refusal for the president: a divided assembly with not a single party able to obtain an decisive control. He ceased to impose his policies to lawmakers. The problem is that he has at no point acknowledged that outcome. Besides has he consistently refused to select a prime minister from the left-wing bloc which won a plurality of ballots, but he persistently keeps attempting to form a cabinet aligned with his individual opinions, despite the fact that they have been dismissed at the ballot box. Each attempt to date has ended in failure with government heads resigning in quick succession.
The PM's return (as one of the most faithful of his core team), provides back-to-back cabinets with barely any change, with a lot of the “new” ministers calling themselves supporters of Macron and several others hailing from the conservative group that party, which achieved merely a small percentage in the most recent general elections.
Presently at the whim of a one man – a leader used to enforcing his agendas to a acquiescent parliamentary majority. His party is on political life support but it has attempted a final frantic grab for control thanks to the unlikely assistance of a leftwing party. That political group, which in that year was a member of the left coalition that fiercely opposed Macron, has now entered into a pact with the government. It came to the table with significant starting requests – such as, importantly, the establishment of a “Zucman tax” (a planned charge on the billionaires, modeled after the expert that economist), and the cancellation of the president's social security overhaul. In the end, the mere promise of halting the hugely unpopular social security amendment – with minimal certainty – was sufficient to secure a vow to refrain from opposing the complete spending proposal.
The Socialists are engaged praising the pause of the unpopular pension reform. But according to the expert Zemmour, this is only a delay in the implementation schedule – that keeps the pension age at sixty-four and permits a few generations to benefit, without any structural reconsideration of the changes.
It's vital to observe, as well, that austerity-driven financial decreases have earlier imposed actual negative effects: in that month, museum workers went on strike and shut down the gallery, denouncing staff reductions and the insufficient resources for security.
Yet, instead of supporting their voters, left-wing figures are enabling him secure extra period for his doomed reform project.
A short while ago the author was featured on a television discussion, analyzing the selection of the new government. I mentioned how exasperating it was to be in the identical circumstances as the week before, only now with the feeling that politicians were deceiving citizens. One of the other speakers interrupted me to state there had been “some progress” and that we needed to elaborate to the audience”.
What to {explain|clar
Tech enthusiast and writer with a passion for exploring emerging technologies and their impact on society.